Legal disclosure according to §§ 24, 25 Austrian media law and § 5 E-Commerce law:

Media owner, publisher, responsible for content and editorial office, service provider:

Austrian Academy of Sciences
Corporate body organized under public law (BGBl 569/1921 idF BGBl I 130/2003)
Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage (ACDH-CH)
Dr. Ignaz Seipel-Platz 2, 1010 Vienna, Austria

Nature and purpose of the business:

The Austrian Academy of Sciences (OEAW) has the legal duty to support the sciences and humanities in every respect. As a learned society, the OEAW fosters discourse and cooperation between science and society, politics and economy.
The Austrian Centre for Digital Humanities and Cultural Heritage (ACDH-CH) is an OEAW institute founded with the goal to support digital methods in arts and humanities disciplines. The ACDH-CH supports digital research in manifold ways.

Signing power:

President: o. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Anton Zeilinger
Vice President: Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. Arnold Suppan
Class President: Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. Oliver Jens Schmitt
Class President: Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Georg Brasseur
The Academy Council exists as supervisory body. For more information see

Main aim:

Data entry for the MAMEMS project.


The Austrian Academy of Sciences does not take responsibility for the nature, accuracy, entirety or quality of the provided information.
In the case of links to websites of other media owners, whose content the OEAW is neither directly nor indirectly responsible for, the OEAW does not assume liability for their content and excludes any liability in this case.

Data privacy notice:

By using this website, you agree to the manner and purposes of data processing. You can disable cookies in your browser settings. However, this might limit functionality of this website.
Please find the ÖAW's detailed data privacy statement here. The contact data published in the context of the imprint duty may not be used to send promotional or informational material not explicitly requested. We explicitly disagree with this usage.